Welcome Students!

January 2, 2012 in Essayist, Featured

Composition 102, The University of Cincinnati.

Hello and welcome to the main site for our course. We will be alternatively using wordpress and blackboard for our course assignments. There are links for resources and websites to read for source material and ideas posted here and for our main course website. That can be accessed here http://blackboard.uc.edu/

In addition, I encourage you to play around with your blog, see what websites you find interesting, and post comments on them. It works similar to facebook in that regard. For due dates, assignments, and other information please visit the Assignments page. You may visit the main blog (This Page) for research tips, thoughts, and resources. For instructions in how to set up your personal research blog as well as to visit your peer’s websites, go to the Student Sites Page. If you have any questions feel free to email me at rushoscy@mail.uc.edu

Best,

CRO

 

Borrowed but Good

January 12, 2012 in Essayist

I’d like you to read this post by a Mr. Urback.

 

http://apps.carleton.edu/carletonian/?story_id=788111&issue_id=788041

 

Yes! Another paper: Rethinking writing in college

October 28, 2011
By Stuart Urback

Quick Disclaimer: I firmly believe that a liberal arts education is something that can have an impact on anyone and everyone.

I have this theory about games.  I think the reason we play games is because of a single primary action that defines that game.  Our enjoyment of that action largely determines our enjoyment of the game.  In soccer it’s kicking, in Ultimate it’s throwing, in poker it’s revealing your hand, and in Super Mario it’s making little Mario jump.

For college, writing is in some ways the Super Mario jump.  It’s the one thing we do over.

And over.

And over.

It’s the one thing we produce at all levels in all departments over and over as the primary method of moving our education forward.

And, if there’s anything I’ve learned from game design, it’s that if you’re asking your players to do something over and over, it better be FUN. Huge, all-caps, bold, italicized, blinking letters, FUN.

But the attitude towards writing is often rather tangential to what happens at college.  It is the product, not the process, it’s something we bang out at four in the morning when we’ve exhausted all other possible excuses.  And I think that’s a bit of a problem.

Now I’m not trying to say that everyone hates writing.  Far from it.  I think it’s something many of us enjoy, but the connection is often between writing and grade, not writing and education.  We write to get a grade, not to learn.
In short, as long as writing is a representation of what we know, it will always be a byproduct and a leftover.  The creation of an essay shouldn’t just be about reproducing what we know, it should be about actively constructing our knowledge. I don’t think this fact is emphasized enough.

For example, the Writing Portfolio, one of the signature elements of a Carleton education, is one of the most resented tasks of Sophomore year; a task that is generally followed by great relief.  Shouldn’t it be the other way around?  Shouldn’t the point of this process be to get students so excited about writing that they want to do it for fun?
Maybe this is my personal experience, but no professor or administrator has explained to me why they, you know, enjoy writing.  It would seem like in order to be involved in academia this would be something you really enjoy, but this enjoyment isn’t something that’s articulated.  Maybe instead of trying to prove to students why writing is useful, important, and/or necessary, we should focus on making it fun.

Perhaps I’m just crazy and this is an absolutely ridiculous goal, but it’s not like college doesn’t teach us to enjoy other activities that we first found questionable.  That’s the whole point of becoming a major, to learn to enjoy the process of working in that field, not just why it’s useful.  Shouldn’t every class at Carleton be about teaching the methodology of how writing is enjoyable?

If we fail to make writing its own intrinsically motivating activity, if we fail to make writing not a representation of education but an action that has significant intrinsic meaning, have we really done our job as an educational institution?

If writing is fun, and intrinsically motivating, it might not change the fact that we do it at four in the morning the night before, but it would change how we approach it and how we respond when challenged.

It wasn’t until the end of Sophomore year after I was done complaining about the Writing Portfolio that I realized I actually enjoyed writing.  And while you might quickly point out that the Writing Portfolio probably helped nudge that realization along (which I will begrudgingly admit), I will say that at no point did I ever want to do the Writing Portfolio of my own accord.  And I think it’s a huge issue that this lack of motivation is a common perspective.

Writing should be like making Mario jump in Super Mario, throwing a frisbee in Ultimate, or laying out a brilliant hand of cards in Poker.  We know we won’t win all the time, but we still do it because it’s fun.

What if we came to school because we got the chance to write over and over again?

An Exercise in Deconstruction (Blog Prompt 2)

January 2, 2012 in Essayist, Featured

Check out this link. First of all, I want you to think objectively. What is going on here? Using the skills you gained in comp 1, explain in 500 words who the audience is, what their motivation might be, and where they are getting their information. Go on to make a brief Rhetorical Analysis. The point here is to transfer your skills in comp 1 to being able to analyze a source.

The Gettysburg Address (Blog Prompt 1)

January 2, 2012 in Essayist, Featured

think there has to be some benefit to humanity as a whole in order to have your argument qualify as legitimate. I wonder if this sticks in everyone’s mind subconsciously. when I see an argument, whether it’s scientific or not, it’s geared towards our own selfish ends. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. When we as students or scholars attempt to make an argument, even if it’s wrong, we are doing it with a goal in mind.

I think some of the most efficient arguments were so successful because the author removed themselves from the equation. Take Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address:

We all know the history behind the address. But Lincoln’s words went down in history in one of the greatest debates in our nation’s past. And people remembered it.

What are some of your thoughts on this issue? Why do you think these words were so memorable? Let’s have a discussion.

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.